Hello
maybe I don't understand well your idea. There exist simple syntax -
table function
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-02/msg00341.php
and it is standard
regards
Pavel Stehule
On 30/03/2008, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to take a whack at making set-returning functions returning
> SETOF RECORD a little more fun to use. Let's imagine that we have a
> table foo and a function returning SETOF RECORD that can return foos.
> The call might look something like:
>
> SELECT a, b, c
> FROM f(ROW OF foo)
> WHERE ...;
>
> This would make it much easier and less error-prone to use SETOF
> RECORD.
>
> Would others like to see such a feature?
>
> If so, what pieces of the code would I be touching for the first
> patch?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
> --
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
