Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
Date
Msg-id 162867790709141306l7750f957m290a3e925f89a5c7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Would it make sense to expand this to something like:
>
> Make it possible for rules to return affected tuples?
>
> I come to this because if you use a rule to create an updateable view,
> you never know how many rows the view actually updated.
>

Updatable views can be (maybe) implemented with updatable cursors.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00335.php


Regards
Pavel Stehule


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Don Walker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of global and static variables in shared libraries
Next
From: Hannes Eder
Date:
Subject: Re: MSVC build system