Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity
Date
Msg-id 162867790708170853mab4303ftaa06836de265fbe5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity  (Janning Vygen <vygen@planwerk6.de>)
List pgsql-general
>
> looks strange to me too, but i never had foreign keys to the same table.
> it works if you define your chekced_by FK deferrable with
>
> checked_by INT REFERENCES users (id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL
> DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED,
>
> it seams that postgresql does its job in a procedural way instead of
> relational.
>

It is solved. It was PostgreSQL bug repaired
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-08/msg00207.php
Thank you
nice a day
Pavel Stehule

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ted Byers
Date:
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Transaction auto-abort causes grief with Spring Framework
Next
From: "Phoenix Kiula"
Date:
Subject: FInding "corrupt" values in UTF-8 tables (regexp question, I think)