why it doesn't work? referential integrity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject why it doesn't work? referential integrity
Date
Msg-id 162867790708110328gf5a045dtf388d4b1e9e640d9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity  (Janning Vygen <vygen@planwerk6.de>)
List pgsql-general
Hello

I found strange postgresql's behave. Can somebody explain it?

Regards
Pavel Stehule

CREATE TABLE users (
  id integer NOT NULL,
  name VARCHAR NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (id)
);

INSERT INTO users VALUES (1, 'Jozko');
INSERT INTO users VALUES (2, 'Ferko');
INSERT INTO users VALUES (3, 'Samko');

CREATE TABLE tasks (
  id integer NOT NULL,
  owner INT REFERENCES  users (id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL,
  worker INT REFERENCES users (id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL,
  checked_by INT REFERENCES users (id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
INSERT INTO tasks VALUES (1,1,NULL,NULL);
INSERT INTO tasks VALUES (2,2,2,NULL);
INSERT INTO tasks VALUES (3,3,3,3);

DELETE FROM users WHERE id = 1; -- works simple
DELETE FROM users WHERE id = 2; -- works ok
DELETE FROM users WHERE id = 3; -- doesn't work, why?

ERROR:  insert or update on table "tasks" violates foreign key
constraint "tasks_checked_by_fkey"
DETAIL:  Key (checked_by)=(3) is not present in table "users".
CONTEXT:  SQL statement "UPDATE ONLY "public"."tasks" SET "worker" =
NULL WHERE $1 OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) "worker""

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ragnar
Date:
Subject: Re: Are these two creation commands functionally identical?
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity