Re: plperl vs. bytea - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: plperl vs. bytea
Date
Msg-id 162867790705062238x54a895bx2412ac1678384d61@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs. bytea  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> What we've basically got here is a complaint that the default
> textual-representation-based method for transmitting PL function
> parameters and results is awkward and inefficient for bytea.
> So the first question is whether this is really localized to only
> bytea, and if not which other types have got similar issues.
> (Even if you make the case that no other scalar types need help,
> what of bytea[] and composite types containing bytea or bytea[]?)
>

It can be solution for known isues. Current textual representation is
more ugly hack than everythink else.

Regards
Pavel Stehule


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum does not start in HEAD
Next
From: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Date:
Subject: Stats not updated after rollback -- autovacuum confused.