Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date
Msg-id 16261.25236.660006.404380@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
>>>>> "OE" == Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:

OE> MySQL's licence does not require you to buy a licence for _any_
OE> commercial use, but only for commercial use where you do not release
OE> your source code under a GPL-compatible licence.

So if I write my application in python, say, and only relase the .pyc
files, I'm not linked to mysql, but I use it via the API provided by
the python runtime.  The GPL does not require me to release the source
code to my application, yet I'm using mysql in a commercial setting.
I believe that mysql will demand a license fee from me in this
situation.

It is very murky with mysql.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: relation vs table...
Next
From: nolan@celery.tssi.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)