Re: BUG #18151: pg_upgradecluster fails when column default refers to column - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #18151: pg_upgradecluster fails when column default refers to column
Date
Msg-id 162382.1696869764@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18151: pg_upgradecluster fails when column default refers to column  (Liam Morland <liam@morland.ca>)
List pgsql-bugs
Liam Morland <liam@morland.ca> writes:
> 2023-10-09 10:11-0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: [...]
>> Is that function written in old-style (with a string literal for the 
>> body) or new-style with BEGIN ATOMIC? [...]

> It is old-style. I wrote it before PG 14.

OK, so it should work ...

>> Can you show us the exact DDL definition of both the table and the 
>> function? [...]

>> From the output of pg_dump:

> CREATE FUNCTION public.event_id_nextval() RETURNS integer
>     LANGUAGE sql
>     AS $$
>   SELECT COALESCE(MAX(event_id) + 1, 1) FROM event;
>   $$;

> CREATE TABLE public.event (
>     event_id integer DEFAULT public.event_id_nextval() NOT NULL,


Oh ... I thought of a plausible explanation, or part of an
explanation.  That function is not search-path-safe: if it's run with
a search_path that doesn't include "public", it'll fail as described.
And indeed dump/restore will use a restrictive search_path setting.
So the COPY bug I alluded to before could trigger the reported
failure, if the upgrade is transferring data to the new cluster using
COPY rather than physically moving files around.

I see that pg_upgradecluster defaults to using dump/restore rather
than pg_upgrade, which surprises me, but if you used that mode then
all is explained.

Bug or no bug, that function would be better written as

   SELECT COALESCE(MAX(event_id) + 1, 1) FROM public.event;

so that it still works under a restrictive search path.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Liam Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18151: pg_upgradecluster fails when column default refers to column
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Access to old versions of a row