thread safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lee Kindness
Subject thread safety
Date
Msg-id 16211.32489.732854.901389@kelvin.csl.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to thread safety  ("Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: thread safety
List pgsql-hackers
Probably because I worked on thread safety and produced a patch. If
someone done the same for PITR and produced a patch i'm sure it would
have generated much more interest. I couldn't have done PITR, so no
loss of resource there.

Was Bruce planning to do the PITR work? If so I guess a lot of his
time's been spent on integrating patches and the like - leaving less
time for other developments.

L.

Mendola Gaetano writes:> I seen on this list a lot of energy ( also little flames involving SCO > & Co. ) spent on
threadsafety;> was really necessary spent so much energy in this direction?> I was at Fosdem in Bruxelles ( I spoke
thereabout the use> of postgres in my project ) and I seen al people there > was really exicited about the anticipation
ofBruce Momjian > about the PITR in 7.4 but how we know there was no time for it> > May be I'm wrong but I'd like know
whythread safety was so> necessary.> > > Regards> Gaetano Mendola> 
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Preliminary notes about hash index concurrency (long)
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)