Alexander Loginov <sas@mplik.ru> writes:
> I have only one small question. Can I do REINDEX during inserting
> of information into tables. Or I must block somehow updating of
> tables.
Hmmm ... it looks like REINDEX only grabs AccessShareLock on the target
relation, which seems very wrong. Hiroshi, doesn't it need to get a
stronger lock to prevent concurrent insertions? For that matter,
shouldn't the lock be obtained a lot earlier, to ensure the table isn't
dropped partway through? There's a lot of processing here that seems
to be executed while holding no lock at all :-(
regards, tom lane
