the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From PG Doc comments form
Subject the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes
Date
Msg-id 161098966261.468.431083803607667410@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes
List pgsql-docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/sql-vacuum.html
Description:

Hi,

I think the documentation should mention one particular aspect of b-tree
partial indexes: 
Say we have a row that satisfy a partial index's predicate. That row will be
referenced by the partial index. Say now that this row gets updated in such
a way that the updated row no longer satisfies the predicate. The entry of
that row in the index (more precisely, the row previous version) is still
kept in a leaf node of the b-tree until a VACUUM is issued on the index's
table. 

So in short, an update on the index's predicate column results in no direct
change on the index whereas a change on an index column is reflected as soon
as the change has been committed. I think the documentation should mention
this specificity in some way since it can have impact in terms of index
design. I couldn't find a mention of this behavior anywhere in the doc. 

Kind regards,
Chaouki Dhib

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Temporary table semantics
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes