Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name?
Date
Msg-id 15953.1229786005@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Is "Window" really safe as a global typedef name?  ("Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I'm thinking we'd better rename it, but I'm not coming up with
>> anything good; the best I can do after a long day is "EvalWindow",
>> and that doesn't seem particularly inspired.  Any suggestions?

> EvalWindow sounds like a function in src/backend/executor/.

> WindowAgg?

WindowAgg seems like a winner to me, because it draws a parallel to
the regular Agg node type, which seems valid unless I've completely
misunderstood what's happening...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major