Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> we may need a couple of overhaul around HashJoin to support large
> size of data, not only nbuckets around 0x80000000.
Perhaps, but this is a clear bug, introduced to the 9.5 code, with
an obvious fix; so I've pushed the change from 1 to 1L on that left
shift. There was clearly an attempt in surrounding code to deal
with size overruns by using a long, applying a min(), and casting
to int; this one statement just missed a trick. If we need to
further constrain sizes to keep within allocation limits, that
seems like an entirely separate patch.
Thanks for finding and analyzing this and providing a patch!
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
