Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> I was thinking "average runlength". If this were 10 for example, when it
> came to calculating the cost of the index scan, it would divide the
> per-tuple cost by 10.
> You can go the simple calculation method which would count the number of
> times the value in a column was different than the previous value, then
> divide that into the total number of tuples. That's not difficult to
> implement.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to implement, in fact impossible, given
the new sampling-based implementation of ANALYZE. You could only
discover that runs of identical keys exist if you were willing to
examine every row, not just a statistical sample.
Since this seems a rather specialized situation, I'm not eager to pay
that high a price to recognize it ...
regards, tom lane
