Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Georgios Kokolatos
Subject Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans
Date
Msg-id 157977591818.742.16465207652636670142.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans  (Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans
List pgsql-hackers
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  not tested
Implements feature:       not tested
Spec compliant:           not tested
Documentation:            not tested

> Ah, I see. I think I got that from ExplainPrintSettings. I've
> corrected my usage--thanks for pointing it out. I appreciate the
> effort to maintain a consistent style.

Thanks, I am just following the reviewing guide to be honest.

> Also, reviewing my code again, I noticed that when I moved the general
> worker output earlier, I missed part of the merge conflict:

Right. I thought that was intentional.

> which ignores the es->hide_workers flag (it did not fail the tests,
> but the intent is pretty clear). I've corrected this in the current
> patch.

Noted and appreciated.

> I also noticed that we can now handle worker buffer output more
> consistently across TEXT and structured formats, so I made that small
> change too:

Looks good.

> I think the "producing plan output for a worker" process is easier to
> reason about now, and while it changes TEXT format worker output
> order, the other changes in this patch are more drastic so this
> probably does not matter.
> 
> I've also addressed the other feedback above, and reworded a couple of
> comments slightly.

Thanks for the above. Looks clean, does what it says in the tin and solves a
problem that needs solving. All relevant installcheck-world pass. As far as I 
am concerned, I think it is ready to be sent to a committer. Updating the status
accordingly.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel grouping sets