Postgresql Sort cost Poor performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | tank.zhang |
---|---|
Subject | Postgresql Sort cost Poor performance? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1554111914781-0.post@n3.nabble.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Postgresql Sort cost Poor performance?
Re: Postgresql Sort cost Poor performance? |
List | pgsql-performance |
1、postgresql version qis3_dp2=> select * from version(); version --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 11.1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28), 64-bit (1 row) qis3_dp2=> 2、postgresql work_mem qis3_dp2=> SHOW work_mem; work_mem ---------- 2GB (1 row) qis3_dp2=> SHOW shared_buffers; shared_buffers ---------------- 4028MB (1 row) qis3_dp2=> 3、Table count qis3_dp2=> select count(*) from QIS_CARPASSEDSTATION; count ---------- 11453079 (1 row) qis3_dp2=> 4、table desc qis3_dp2=> \dS QIS_CARPASSEDSTATION; Table "qis_schema.qis_carpassedstation" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------------+-----------------------------+-----------+----------+--------- iid | integer | | not null | scartypecd | character varying(50) | | | svin | character varying(20) | | | sstationcd | character varying(50) | | | dpassedtime | timestamp(6) with time zone | | | dworkdate | date | | | iworkyear | integer | | | iworkmonth | integer | | | iweek | integer | | | sinputteamcd | character varying(20) | | | sinputdutycd | character varying(20) | | | smtoc | character varying(50) | | | slineno | character varying(18) | | | Indexes: "qis_carpassedstation_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (iid) "q_carp_dworkdate" btree (dworkdate) "q_carp_smtoc" btree (smtoc) qis3_dp2=> 5、Execute SQL: qis3_dp2=> EXPLAIN (analyze true,buffers true) SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT SVIN) AS CHECKCARNUM ,SMTOC FROM QIS_CARPASSEDSTATION A WHERE 1=1 AND A.SSTATIONCD = 'VQ3_LYG' AND A.SLINENO IN ( '1F' , '2F' , '3F' ) AND A.DWORKDATE >= TO_DATE('2017-02-11','YYYY-MM-DD') AND A.DWORKDATE <= TO_DATE('2019-03-11','YYYY-MM-DD') group by SMTOC ; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------- GroupAggregate (cost=697738.61..714224.02 rows=372 width=30) (actual time=5908.786..32420.412 rows=410 loops=1) Group Key: smtoc Buffers: shared hit=401 read=184983 I/O Timings: read=1377.762 -> Sort (cost=697738.61..703232.51 rows=2197559 width=40) (actual time=5907.791..6139.351 rows=2142215 loops=1) Sort Key: smtoc Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 265665kB Buffers: shared hit=401 read=184983 I/O Timings: read=1377.762 -> Gather (cost=1000.00..466253.56 rows=2197559 width=40) (actual time=0.641..1934.614 rows=2142215 loops=1) Workers Planned: 5 Workers Launched: 5 Buffers: shared hit=401 read=184983 I/O Timings: read=1377.762 -> Parallel Seq Scan on qis_carpassedstation a (cost=0.00..245497.66 rows=439512 width=40) (actual time=0.245..1940.527 rows=357036 loops=6) Filter: (((sstationcd)::text = 'VQ3_LYG'::text) AND ((slineno)::text = ANY ('{1F,2F,3F}'::text[])) AND (dworkdate >= to_date('2017-02-11'::text, 'YYYY-MM-DD'::text)) AND (dworkdate <= to_da te('2019-03-11'::text, 'YYYY-MM-DD'::text))) Rows Removed by Filter: 1551811 Buffers: shared hit=401 read=184983 I/O Timings: read=1377.762 Planning Time: 0.393 ms Execution Time: 32439.704 ms (21 rows) qis3_dp2=> 6、Why does sort take a long time to execute and how can you optimize it? Thanks!!! -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
pgsql-performance by date: