Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date
Msg-id 15359.1348499072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
> will see something different in the two of them.  Could you have used
> default in one and a non-dash in the other.  Did we change the way we
> canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?

IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed