Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date
Msg-id 20120924150733.GF21242@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:04:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
> > will see something different in the two of them.  Could you have used
> > default in one and a non-dash in the other.  Did we change the way we
> > canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?
> 
> IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
> That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.

Ah, so that would explain the change he is seeing.  I will work on a
patch.  I am working on the information_schema patch now.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?