Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date
Msg-id 50607AAE.70400@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/24/12 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
>> will see something different in the two of them.  Could you have used
>> default in one and a non-dash in the other.  Did we change the way we
>> canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?
> 
> IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
> That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.

initdb has changed POSIX to C with glibc at least since 8.3.  The code
you're quoting is just a refactoring, AFAICT.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: External Replication
Next
From: Roberto Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?