On 2018-Jul-07, David Fetter composed:
> If they have no plans to practice any exclusive rights, our standard thing
> process where individuals submit things and consent to have us name them
> with the PGDG copyright and distribute them under TPL would be the
> most straightforward approach to achieve it.
Eh, however in the event that the submitting organization has licenses,
would it not be untrustworthy
to distribute as PGDG copyright and permit with no joined patent give?
Some other organization getting a restrictive fork from Postgres could later
be sued by the submitting organization, on the grounds that there is no
legitimate standing
for them to utilize the licensed code.
TBH I don't see in what capacity would we be able to double permit the code
in a way that
secures those restrictive forks. Can you (Andres) clarify what is the
thought?
Regards:
Kamagra <https://www.potenz4all.com/>
-----
Kamagra
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
