What's wrong with using the appropriate tool for the task at hand? If
you don't need the features of a database don't use one!
If you've got modest DB needs look for an appropriate DB:
gdbm: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdbm/
Berkeley DB: http://www.sleepycat.com/
Personally if I only had one table I'd be making my own, highly tuned,
access routines and storage...
Regards, Lee.
Ben-Nes Michael writes:
> Hi All
>
> If the speed will be much higher I might humbly suggest to develop two kind
> of tables.
> 1. like the current one ( with great integrity )
> 2. Like MySQL or even less sophisticated for application that need to work
> very fast against one table only.
>
> Example:
> News page that require the most simple select ( select * from news; ) and
> only one man update it once a day.
> session table which require on each web page update,insert,select,delete.
> ( some times more then once ) especially if I store class var init.
>
> Think on the programing benefit and the commercial publicity Postgresql can
> get by telling: "we supply Oracle complexity & MySQL simplicity"
>
> Cheer
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
> To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>
> Cc: "Doug McNaught" <doug@wireboard.com>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Disable Transaction - plans ?
>
>
> > ...
> > > If the developers think that the speed increase is irrelevant then lets
> drop
> > > the issue :)
> >
> > No problem. We will be happy to entertain patches or demonstrations that
> > show a clear benefit in speed for the changes you suggest.
> >
> > - Thomas
> >
> --------------------------
> Canaan Surfing Ltd.
> Internet Service Providers
> Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
> Tel: 972-4-6991122
> http://sites.canaan.co.il
> --------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org