On 12.08.2019 00:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> This topic seems to have slipped through the cracks, which is too bad
> because we surely could have gotten it fixed in time for last week's
> releases. Oh well.
It is true. Also July commitfest had started by that time and it wasn't
possible to add a new entry.
> I think Daniel's patch leaves more on the table than it needs to,
> and I don't like Arthur's patch because it's assuming more than it
> should about whether it's okay to pass a "char" to u_isalpha().
> I propose that we do things as attached, instead.
Yeah, u_isalpha() wasn't such good idea here. BTW Daniel already
mentioned it above.
With the patch regression tests pass for me and James test case works
fine as expected.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
