Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> On 12.08.2019 00:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think Daniel's patch leaves more on the table than it needs to,
>> and I don't like Arthur's patch because it's assuming more than it
>> should about whether it's okay to pass a "char" to u_isalpha().
>> I propose that we do things as attached, instead.
> Yeah, u_isalpha() wasn't such good idea here. BTW Daniel already
> mentioned it above.
> With the patch regression tests pass for me and James test case works
> fine as expected.
Thanks for double-checking! Pushed now.
regards, tom lane