Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date
Msg-id 1492578.1732574410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
List pgsql-bugs
I wrote:
> And done.  In the event I decided to try the +simd option first,
> reasoning that that's correct on the majority of current ARM systems.
> I'm interested to see what the older buildfarm ARM animals pick.

Early returns are that they're all picking the +simd option, and
seem to be just as happy with that as they were without it.
I wonder if we could just drop the "without" probe altogether.
It'd save some configure cycles for other platforms (since they'll
fruitlessly run through all of these tests).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)