Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Date
Msg-id 14885.1245164665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
List pgsql-www
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So the rest of us have to start filtering junk from our -www
>> subscription? �Please undo this.

> Unless you have a better way of ensuring everything gets moderated.
> This was discussed last week,

Discussed where?  Not here, that I saw.

Personally, I'm perfectly capable of procmail'ing these things into
oblivion, and I'm sure most of the other subscribers to -www are too.
So in a week or so the only effect that these missives will have is
to permanently clutter the list archives.

(If you wanted actual shame, how about a report saying "so-and-so
hasn't done any moderation work in X weeks"?)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16