Re: Index AM change proposals, redux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
Date
Msg-id 14842.1207939756@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index AM change proposals, redux  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
List pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> Slightly offtopic. How to get benefit on tuple level ? For example,
> we mark GiST tsearch index as lossy, while for not very big documents it's
> actually exact and we could save a lot not rechecking them.

Won't that just fall out of this?  Assuming the consistent() function
knows when the match is exact, it can set the flag properly.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: Separate psql commands from arguments