Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 01:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> How would we do that? libpqsrv_cancel is not chartered to wait around
>> for the results of the cancel, and I'm not even sure that it could
>> know what to check for.
> Ah yeah, you're right. I got confused by the two timeouts (the one to
> wait for the response of the cancel request itself, and the one to
> wait for the running query to actually be cancelled).
Not having heard any better ideas, I pushed that to HEAD and v17
(with the renaming you suggested).
regards, tom lane
