Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mark Anns
Subject Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Date
Msg-id 1479734117063-5931271.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-general
What are the functions (for example) are available/not available to get
transformed to GPU source code?

What is the factor value u consider to get multiplied with actual cost for
CPU? For example, default cpu_tuple_cost is 0.01.

Consider, for example, if the cost=0.00..458.00 for seq scan, how can it be
multiplied to get the cost for GPU? considering any one gpu card.

Is there any documentation regarding these details in GPU?



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/How-the-Planner-in-PGStrom-differs-from-PostgreSQL-tp5929724p5931271.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Man
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to change order sort of table in HashJoin
Next
From: Benedikt Grundmann
Date:
Subject: How to introspect autovacuum analyze settings