Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes:
> In one we SearchSysCache(), simple_heap_delete(), and then
> ReleaseSysCache(). In the other we SearchSysCacheCopy(),
> simple_heap_delete, and heap_freetuple().
> Are they two parallel ways, or is one better?
I don't think it matters much anymore. The copy approach takes a few
more cycles, though, to no good purpose since you have no need to modify
the tuple struct obtained from cache. (When updating a tuple, copying
the cache entry and scribbling directly on the copy is sometimes more
convenient than calling heap_modifytuple to build a new tuple.)
regards, tom lane
