Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date
Msg-id 14459.1473189179@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres  (Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com> writes:
> Could someone help me with a few procedural questions?

> (1) This page: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
> lists the current commitfest's manager as "(vacant)".  But this page:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ seems to indicate that a commitfest
> is currently in progress.  Is there a commitfest manager at the
> moment?

Fabrízio de Royes Mello is it.  I guess he hasn't noticed that that
page ought to be updated.

> (2) It seems like there are still a few big questions about this commit:
>    - Is it wanted at the moment?  It didn't seem like there's a
>      consensus about whether or not this enhancement should be
>      merged, even if the patch is pretty minimal.
>    - It seems like there are two competing patch
>      sets in play for this enhancement: Joy's and
>      Peter's.  Presumably at most one of them would
>      be merged.

These are things that reviews should be helping to decide.  It's probably
a squishier topic than some patches, but if you're interested, feel free
to read code and weigh in.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading
Next
From: Christian Convey
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres