Re: Add PortalDrop in exec_execute_message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Add PortalDrop in exec_execute_message
Date
Msg-id 1428037.1623265668@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add PortalDrop in exec_execute_message  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> It turns out that the problem is specific to SELECT FOR UPDATE, and
> it happens because nodeLockRows is not careful to shut down the
> EvalPlanQual mechanism it uses before returning NULL at the end of
> a scan.  If EPQ has been fired, it'll be holding a tuple slot
> referencing whatever tuple it was last asked about.  The attached
> trivial patch seems to take care of the issue nicely, while adding
> little if any overhead.  (A repeat call to EvalPlanQualEnd doesn't
> do much.)

BTW, to be clear: I think Alvaro's change is also necessary.
If libpq is going to silently do something different in pipeline
mode than it does in normal mode, it should strive to minimize
the semantic difference.  exec_simple_query includes a PortalDrop,
so we'd best do the same in pipeline mode.  But this LockRows
misbehavior would be visible in other operating modes anyway.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types