Re: psql possible TODO - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql possible TODO
Date
Msg-id 14267.1165357803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql possible TODO  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: psql possible TODO
Re: psql possible TODO
Re: psql possible TODO
Re: psql possible TODO
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> control-R isn't real useful for 17 queries that are exactly the same
> except for 3 different join clauses. It also isn't useful when you don't
> know exactly what query you are looking for.

... but, somehow, you know exactly what command number it has?
The above seems completely unimpressive as arguments for adding
command-number-based recall.

>> What we have is just like bash --- at least the parts of it that I use.
> Yes, and I am trying to add more functionality that is like bash :)

It's like a part of bash that's been obsolete since readline was
written, and probably would never have existed at all if readline had
appeared first.  I can't really picture a situation in which this is an
improvement over the readline facilities.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO