Re: psql possible TODO - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: psql possible TODO
Date
Msg-id 200612052234.kB5MYDn24974@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql possible TODO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: psql possible TODO
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > control-R isn't real useful for 17 queries that are exactly the same
> > except for 3 different join clauses. It also isn't useful when you don't
> > know exactly what query you are looking for.
> 
> ... but, somehow, you know exactly what command number it has?
> The above seems completely unimpressive as arguments for adding
> command-number-based recall.
> 
> >> What we have is just like bash --- at least the parts of it that I use.
> > Yes, and I am trying to add more functionality that is like bash :)
> 
> It's like a part of bash that's been obsolete since readline was
> written, and probably would never have existed at all if readline had
> appeared first.  I can't really picture a situation in which this is an
> improvement over the readline facilities.

Yea, that was my impression.  It seemed so awkward, but so is 'vi' to
me.  (Me ducks.)

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO