Paul Ramsey wrote
> Though maybe with a really big table? (with really big
> objects?) Though still, doesn't analyze just pull a limited sample
> (30K approx max) so why would table size make any difference after a
> certain point?
Hi paul, "my" table is quite big (about 293.049.000 records) but the objects
are not.
nodes[] contains maximal 2000 bigint and tags[] up to some hundred chars,
sometimes some thousands chars.
watching the memory usage of the autovaccum process: is was getting bigger
and bigger at nearly constant speed. some MB per minute, iir.
i'm just recreating planet_osm_ways_nodes without "fastupdate=off"
regards
walter
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/autovacuum-worker-running-amok-and-me-too-tp5840299p5840485.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
