Re: pg_locks needs a facelift - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
Date
Msg-id 14187.1115178221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_locks needs a facelift  ("Jim C. Nasby")
Responses Re: pg_locks needs a facelift  ("Jim C. Nasby")
List pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <> writes:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:08AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> 1998 when the oid played a larger role, it is now quite rightly
>> deprecated and my intention is to remove it from the userlock module.

> I wish you wouldn't since http://rrs.decibel.org uses it.

Don't worry, I'll veto any immediate removal of functionality ;-)

The correct way to handle this is to add some better userlock
functionality and deprecate what's there.  We can remove the crufty
stuff in a release or three after it's been officially deprecated
... but there is no reason to remove it immediately.  It won't conflict
with a better version, just exist alongside.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement