Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error
Date
Msg-id 14014.1132847549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error  (Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk>)
Responses Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error  (Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk>)
List pgsql-general
Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk> writes:
> bugasbase2=# vacuum;
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 597621 is uninitialized --- fixing

This is the expected result of what you did.

> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640793 is uninitialized --- fixing
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640794 is uninitialized --- fixing
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640795 is uninitialized --- fixing
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640796 is uninitialized --- fixing
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640797 is uninitialized --- fixing
> WARNING:  relation "mba_data_base" page 640798 is uninitialized --- fixing

That's a bit odd.  There are scenarios where all-zero pages can
legitimately appear in a PG file --- specifically, if PG extends
the table and the OS completes that task, but then there's a crash
before PG gets to write any data into the new page.  Conceivably a
crash during a bulk data load process could result in half a dozen
such pages together, but it seems improbable.  Try looking at the
data on the preceding and following pages --- does it look like there's
something missing?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adam Witney
Date:
Subject: Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error
Next
From: Adam Witney
Date:
Subject: Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error