Op 12-09-2022 om 16:00 schreef Erik Rijkers:
> Op 12-09-2022 om 09:58 schreef Daniel Gustafsson:
>>> On 9 Sep 2022, at 11:00, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 2022, at 5:53 PM, John Naylor
>>>> <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>>>> [v4-0001-Add-include-exclude-filtering-via-file-in-pg_dump.patch]
>
> I noticed that pg_restore --filter cannot, or at last not always, be
> used with the same filter-file that was used to produce a dump with
> pg_dump --filter.
>
> Is that as designed? It seems a bit counterintuitive. It'd be nice if
> that could be fixed. Admittedly, the 'same' problem in pg_restore -t,
> also less than ideal.
>
> (A messy bashdemo below)
I hope the issue is still clear, even though in the bash I sent, I
messed up the dumpfile name (i.e., in the bash that I sent the pg_dump
creates another dump name than what is given to pg_restore. They should
use the same dumpname, obviously)
>
> thanks,
>
> Erik Rijkers
