On 1/7/25 21:06, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> According to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/datatype-numeric.html, the
> smallest numeric type supports numbers from -32768 to 32767/
In this case it does not matter, but you should not consult
documentation that is for a version(9.1) that is ~8 years past EOL.
Go here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/
and click on Current or the version you are actually using.
>
> My data will be in a range of [0..4], and so I guess my DB table will waste
> space, right?
Yes, though is that actually going to be an issue?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
