Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class
Date
Msg-id 139b3cf5-5add-03f0-53f2-6a6762b19b42@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-05-09 15:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we can get rid of the ability to reload the information_schema
>> after initdb.  That was interesting in the early phase of its
>> development, but now it just creates complications.
> We've relied on that more than once to allow minor-release updates of
> information_schema views, so I think losing the ability to do it is
> a bad idea.

In those cases we used CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW, which preserves OIDs.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove useless associativity/precedence from parsers
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unlogged tables cleanup