Re: [GENARAL] round() bug - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G Johnston
Subject Re: [GENARAL] round() bug
Date
Msg-id 1397578808070-5800118.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENARAL] round() bug?  (Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENARAL] round() bug  (Raymond O'Donnell <rod@iol.ie>)
List pgsql-general
Willy-Bas Loos-3 wrote
> Hi,
> I ran into some strange behavior.
> Seems like a bug to me?
>
> wbloos=# select round(0.5::numeric), round(0.5::double precision);
>  round | round
> -------+-------
>      1 |     0
> (1 row)

Not a bug; and likely to simple to have escaped notice this long so the
first reaction should be "what am I missing here?"

[google: round .5 postgresql]

http://grokbase.com/t/postgresql/pgsql-hackers/03ap11tckn/round-function-wrong/oldest

Round( numeric ) - 0.5 rounds away from zero
Round( float ) - platform dependent, IEEE 0.5 rounds toward even

You can argue the decision but at this point it's not likely to change.

David J.




--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/GENARAL-round-bug-tp5800087p5800118.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: Approach to Data Summary and Analysis
Next
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENARAL] round() bug