Re: Review: Extensions Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kineticode Billing
Subject Re: Review: Extensions Patch
Date
Msg-id 1394159A-9434-45DA-A32B-71EE6DBD625B@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Extensions Patch  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

>> It's certainly true that a large fraction of contrib modules should be
>> relocatable in that sense, because they just contain C functions that
>> aren't going to care.
>
> As they all currently are using the SET search_path TO public; trick, I
> think they are all relocatable as is and all I need is to remove that
> line (and add the property to the control file).

+1 This alone would be a huge improvement, solving my complaint about @extschema@ for the vast majority of cases. It's
reasonableto make the author of a multi-schema extension or an extension that cannot be moved do more work. 

Best,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Cloos
Date:
Subject: XLog vs SSD [Was: Re: random write in xlog?]
Next
From: Jan Urbański
Date:
Subject: Re: Solving sudoku using SQL