Re: type aliases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Johnston
Subject Re: type aliases
Date
Msg-id 1392479864641-5792207.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: type aliases  (James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>)
Responses Re: type aliases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
James Harper wrote
>>
>> You probably should define your domain like this:
>>
>>    CREATE DOMAIN myvarchar varchar(42);
>>
>
> That's what I thought, so it won't do what I want. I need to be able to
> set the length at the time of declaration.
>
> So suppose I wanted to implement myvarchar in C. In my _in function, how
> do I know how big my column declaration is? Eg if someone tries to insert
> 50 characters into my 42 character field, how do I get the declared length
> and then tell postgres that the data to be inserted is too big?
>
> Thanks
>
> James

IMO. You are abusing the type system to implement things that should be
defined using CHECK constraints.  If indeed you are working with string I
would avoid length-limited type mods and rely on checks/constraints.  There
isn't any viable alternative for numeric scale/precision type modifiers
though :(

There is no current way for a function body to examine the type modifiers of
its input, domain or otherwise.

David J.




--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/type-aliases-tp5792148p5792207.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Clemens Eisserer
Date:
Subject: Re: Will modifications to unlogged tables also be flused to disk?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: type aliases