Bytea(TOAST) vs large object facility(OID) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From kosalram Babu Chellappa
Subject Bytea(TOAST) vs large object facility(OID)
Date
Msg-id 1387829794.22036.YahooMailNeo@web181404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Bytea(TOAST) vs large object facility(OID)  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,
 We have a requirement to store images/documents with an average size of 1-2MB on PostgreSQL database. We have PostgreSQL 9.2.4 running on Red hat linux 64 bit. We decided to setup a stand alone postgreSQL server without streaming replication to host the images/documents only. We are new to postgreSQL and we heard a lot of conversation about using Bytea vs Large object facility. We would be inserting and retrieving document as whole using java webservices call from hibernate/JPA interface into postgreSQL database. Is there any performance benchmark when using ByteA vs Large object facility? Is there a general guidance to use one of these?

Thanks,
Babu

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: slow query - will CLUSTER help?
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing a query