Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Date
Msg-id 1386220597.5734.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lazy people?  I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
> just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.

Actually, I think it probably costs a fair portion of extension authors
when their initial code crashes because they forgot to declare all their
functions V1.  I think it might actually be more of a bother to lazy
people than a benefit.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl fails with config-only directory
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol