Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Date
Msg-id 3422.1386221422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Lazy people?  I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
>> just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.

> Actually, I think it probably costs a fair portion of extension authors
> when their initial code crashes because they forgot to declare all their
> functions V1.  I think it might actually be more of a bother to lazy
> people than a benefit.

Hm.  We have heard one or two complaints like that, but not a huge number.

I'm worried about breaking code that's been working since god-knows-when;
but I will concede there's little evidence that there's very much of that
out there either.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Templates S03E11