Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Date
Msg-id 30761.1386206863@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:45 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Yeah, that's another thing we could simplify if we fixed this problem
>>> at the source.  I think these decisions date from a time when we still
>>> cared about the speed of fmgr_oldstyle.

>> Sure, let's whack that thing with a crowbar.

> Or just remove it.  Who still needs it?

Lazy people?  I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search