Re: Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling
Date
Msg-id 1385562864.77858.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Platform-dependent(?) failure in timeout handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> 3. Establish a coding rule that if you catch an error with
> PG_TRY() and don't re-throw it, you have to unblock signals in
> your PG_CATCH block.

Could that be done in the PG_END_TRY macro?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Hafez Kamal
Date:
Subject: [HITB-Announce] #HITB2014AMS Call for Papers Now Open