On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the goal was to get to RAISE ASSERT
> WHEN ...; then, if assertions are off, you do nothing; if they're on,
> you error. IF condition THEN RAISE..." isn't a suitable surrogate in
> that case because you incur the overhead of testing the condition
> regardless.
So if I do RAISE ASSERT WHEN condition and assertions are off, then
condition wouldn't even be evaluated? But what about RAISE NOTICE WHEN,
when log_min_messages is error? What about the side effects of the
format string? This is all just getting too weird.
I don't see anything wrong with considering a separate ASSERT command
with its own semantics, like in many other programming languages.
