Re: Hot Standby performance issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Primary:

relname    relpages
pg_toast_17673    1812819
pg_toast_17594    161660
pg_toast_17972    121902
pg_toast_17587    77190
pg_toast_18537    29108
pg_toast_17578    26638
pg_toast_17673_index    19984
pg_toast_17868    14911
pg_toast_17594_index    2208
pg_toast_1072246    1922
pg_toast_17587_index    1510
pg_toast_17972_index    1399
pg_statistic    911
pg_toast_18694    883
pg_toast_17578_index    375
pg_attribute    336
pg_toast_16475    332
pg_toast_18537_index    321
pg_proc    233
pg_depend_depender_index    176

From Secondary :
============
relname    relpages
pg_toast_17673    1812819
pg_toast_17594    161660
pg_toast_17972    121902
pg_toast_17587    77190
pg_toast_18537    29108
pg_toast_17578    26638
pg_toast_17673_index    19984
pg_toast_17868    14911
pg_toast_17594_index    2208
pg_toast_1072246    1922
pg_toast_17587_index    1510
pg_toast_17972_index    1399
pg_statistic    911
pg_toast_18694    883
pg_toast_17578_index    375
pg_attribute    336
pg_toast_16475    332
pg_toast_18537_index    321
pg_proc    233
pg_depend_depender_index    176

Yes, result looks same both on primary and standby.




--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Hot-Standby-performance-issue-tp5774673p5775526.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.