Re: Re: Commit finished? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Commit finished?
Date
Msg-id 13764.974311047@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Commit finished?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
>> distribution.  Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
>> of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
>> name for that, not sure).  Peter, any comment here?

> Not only that, but we've had it for several months... :-)

Ah, my mistake.  I looked in backend/parser/Makefile and didn't see
any rule for maintainer-clean, so assumed it wasn't there yet :-(
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: UUNET socket-file-location patch
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Syslog Facility Patch