Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Date
Msg-id 1376.1222830651@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch  (Greg Stark <greg.stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Here are the results of a couple more days' hacking on the CTE patch.

* I cleaned up the processing in the second part of parse_cte.c, where
we are trying to check for validity of a recursive query.  The
conditions that it's checking for are not exactly the same as what was
being looked for previously, so this could do with a bit of review.

* I got rid of the kluges in the executor in favor of treating the
working table as a PARAM_EXEC Param.  Also renamed the plan node
types to RecursiveUnion and WorkTableScan --- I'm not wedded to these
choices, but they seemed more transparent than the former names.

* I have not yet tackled the problem of ensuring single evaluation of
CTEs, but there's a few bits of infrastructure for it.

There are various small loose ends denoted by XXX in the patch, but
the main remaining issue is definitely the single-evaluation business.

            regards, tom lane


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad error message
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad error message